The Carbon Market and the Post-2012 Climate Regime: Key Legal Scenarios

Negotiations on the post-2012 climate regime under the UNFCCC are entering a crucial phase. They are scheduled to be completed at COP 15 in Copenhagen in December 2009. The outcome will have important consequences for the carbon market. The scope and ambitiousness of the agreement on mitigation IN THE post-2012 PERIOD will be crucial for the international demand and supply of credits, and the post-2012 legal framework will determine the general conditions for transactions under the UNFCCC REGIME.

Less then six months before Copenhagen, even the broad outline of the post-2012 legal framework remains undecided. The reasons for this are both political and procedural. Legal issues are politically highly sensitive – this is the main reason why they have not been clarified earlier. Procedurally, negotiations are proceeding on two separate “tracks,” one under the Kyoto Protocol and another one under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The combined effect of these factors is that several different scenarios are possible for the post-2012 legal framework. This article focuses on the main options for the legal design of the post-2012 climate regime and their implications for the carbon market. It argues that the three main options for the post-2012 legal framework include: a single new protocol that will replace the Kyoto Protocol; a combination of an amended Kyoto Protocol and a new protocol; and an amended Kyoto Protocol combined with a series of Conference of the Party (COP) decisions from the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA). The article explains that each of these options has its benefits and downsides, as well as its supporters and opponents, and that it is difficult to predict what legal form the post-2012 climate regime will ultimately take. It analyses the implications of the main legal options for the carbon market, while predicting that at least the detailed rules for any new post-2012 market mechanisms will be finalised only after the Copenhagen conference.

Copyright: © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Quelle: Issue 3/2009 (Oktober 2009)
Seiten: 10
Preis inkl. MwSt.: € 41,65
Autor: Dr. Kati Kulovesi

Artikel weiterleiten In den Warenkorb legen Artikel kommentieren

Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:

One, Two or One and a Half Protocols? An Assessment of Suggested Options for the Legal Form of the Post-2012 Climate Regime
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2009)
The current international climate regime basically consists of two treaties: The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) adopted in 1992, which has nearly universal membership, and the Kyoto Protocol adopted in 1997. The latter treaty obliges developed states listed in Annex I of the UNFCCC to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by the amount inscribed in Annex B of the Kyoto Protocol. However, it only provides for a first commitment period lasting from 2008 to 2012. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish new rules ensuring further emission reductions after 2012.

Stakeholder-based Scenarios for Post-2012 Climate Policy: A Participatory Approach
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2009)
Beginning in the early 1970s, the application of scenario analysis to environmental issues has been a well-established field. Since then, environmental scenario analysis has been used to examine many different scales and types of environmental problems, ranging from global sustainability to specific issues such as changes in emissions, air quality, or land cover in a specific region. Environmental scenarios provide an interdisciplinary framework for analyzing complex environmental problems and envisioning solutions for these problems by, for example, establishing a link between environmental science and policy.

Climate Change, Justice, and Clean Development – A Review of the Copenhagen Negotiating Draft
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2009)
Global climate protection will be at the center of negotiations during the Copenhagen Conference in December 2009. It is very likely that climate change is raising challenges for mankind which have never existed in these dimensions before. In view of the sheer enormity of these challenges, we might also have to consider solutions which have previously never existed.

The Legacy of the Climate Talks in Copenhagen: Hopenhagen or Brokenhagen?
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (4/2010)
This article explores the process and substance of the Copenhagen climate talks in December, 2009, and what they may mean for the future of the climate change regime. The negotiations are considered in their historical context. The substance is assessed against the mandate for the negotiations set in Bali, Indonesia in 2007. The negotiating dynamics are explored by assessing the role of each of the key players. The path forward from Copenhagen under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is considered in light of the substantive outcome and the effect of the Copenhagen talks on the negotiating dynamics. The article concludes by briefly exploring some alternatives to the current approach to climate change under the UNFCCC.

bifa-Text Nr. 45: Anpassung an den Klimawandel: eine Befragung oberbayerischer Unternehmen
© bifa Umweltinstitut GmbH (3/2010)
Das bifa Umweltinstitut untersuchte, in welchem Umfang sich oberbayerische Unternehmen vom Klimawandel betroffen fühlen, welche Aspekte dabei eine Rolle spielen und ob die Anpassung an die unvermeidbaren Folgen ein Thema ist.



 Angemeldet bleiben

Passwort vergessen?