Drill Core Analysis by Neutron Activation (Drill Core Analyzer “CorA”)

In order to ensure the supply of mineral resources, the constant development of new deposits is required. The highest matters of expense may appear during the prospection and exploration and, more precisely, result from the retrieval of samples by drilling and trenching. The samples´ analyses and the evaluation of the results are the basis for further planning steps. Information about the deposit´s extent and quality are needed for a feasibility study, which precedes mining activities.

Conventional geochemical laboratory analyses provide a high sensitivity, yet examine small masses. In order to provide these small individual samples for the analyses, portions of the drill core must be extracted, prepared by digestion, homogenized and divided. This can be considered as unfavorable, since the extracted portion of the drill core might not be a representative sample. Moreover, the sample cannot be recovered, and is not available as evidence or for further examination and processing tests. The system for the analysis of drill cores (see Figure 1) which is to be developed in the project CorA could obtain information from the samples in an efficient and non-destructive manner.

Several non-destructive methods for analyses of drill cores already exist. Hyperspectral imaging, for example, is capable of retrieving structural and mineralogical information from drill cores by the evaluation of emitted shortwave, visible and near-infrared radiation. The measurement time for this analysis is comparably short (about 50 s per 1.5 m core) [01]. However, this surface analysis does not provide any information about the core´s inner composition. The Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) poses an advantage in comparison to existing analytical methods. It could gain information for high level use of resources integrally and non-destructively. NAA is generally divided into PGNAA (Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis) and DGNAA (Delayed Gamma NAA), depending on the measurement time (see Figure 2).

The PGNAA is an analysis method, which detects element-specific signatures quasi-instantaneously emitted by neutron-induced nuclear reactions. The elemental composition of a whole sample can be determined by these signatures. As uncharged particles neutrons have a high penetrability and are able to pass through a massive sample. In the case of drill core analysis, the whole core is examined.

The objective of the project CorA is the development of a system that utilizes PGNAA in order to determine the elemental composition of a drill core non-destructively. For this purpose, PGNAA is not yet a commercially available technology. For the proposed analysis method, a drill core placed in a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) tray would be transported through the measurement system and analyzed segmentally in sections of 10 cm each. PTFE offers the advantage that it consists almost only of carbon and fluorine, which has little influence on the analysis. The PTFE trays would be designed in such a way that they can be filled with samples (drill cores, cuttings or even sludge) on the drilling site. This would abolish further drill core handling or alteration prior to an analysis by the proposed system.

The system to be developed is compact, such that it can be mounted and operated in a standardized container. Provided that all relevant standards for transportation and radiation protection are met, the system could be hauled by a conventional truck or all-terrain vehicle and moved to sites of ongoing drilling operation.

Copyright: © ANTS - Institut für anthropogene Stoffkreisläufe an der RWTH Aachen
Quelle: SBSC 2018 (März 2018)
Seiten: 8
Preis inkl. MwSt.: € 4,00
Autor: Marius Hirsch

Artikel weiterleiten In den Warenkorb legen Artikel kommentieren

Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:

The Impact of the EU’s Russia Sanctions on the Obligations under EU Chemicals Legislation
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (10/2022)
The EU’s sanctions adopted in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine are in numerous ways unprecedented, especially considering the close economic ties that previously existed between the EU and Russia. The sanctions packages have therefore largely separated the two economies (as they intended to do) and thereby severely affected businesses and supply chains in and outside of Europe. While most multinationals are well aware of the impact on trade and have set up advanced compliance systems to ensure no prohibited trade in goods and provision of services takes place, there appears to be less awareness of the impact of the EU’s sanctions on operators’ compliance with EU chemical legislation. However, the sanctions also impact the obligations under the EU’s chemicals regulations, most notably on mandatory sharing of (vertebrate) animal studies but also related to the joint submission of registrations. This contribution hence examines the interplay between the respective obligations under the EU’s sanctions regime and the EU’s chemicals regulations, to allow operators to asses and determine their compliance strategies. While the contribution focuses on the interaction with the Russia sanctions, the same comments would apply generally to other sanctions imposed by the EU.

Muss eine Kommune wirtschaftlich sein?
© ASK-EU (7/2022)
Betrachtung nur bezogen auf die Aufgabenerfüllung bei Abfallwirtschaft, Stadtreinigung und Winterdienst

Nachhaltigkeit und Nachhaltigkeitsmangement unter Berücksichtigung der EU-Taxonomie und des CSRD-Entwurf
© ASK-EU (7/2022)
1 Definition und Abgrenzung 2 Verordnung hinsichtlich der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung von Unternehmen (CSRD-Entwurf) 3 Verordnung über die Einrichtung eines Rahmens zur Erleichterung nachhaltiger Investitionen (Taxonomie-Verordnung) 4 Nachhaltigkeitsmanagementsystem als integraler Bestandteil moderner Unternehmensführung bei kommunalen Unternehmen 5 Zusammenfassung

Deutsche und polnische Verfassungsgerichte und der Vorrang des EU-Rechts
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (5/2022)
Der Beitrag geht in einem ersten Abschnitt der Frage nach, ob und in welchem Umfang das Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 5.5.2020 mit dem geltenden EU-Recht vereinbar ist. Er kommt zu demErgebnis, dass dies nicht der Fall ist, dass Deutschland aber gegen den uneingeschränkten Vorrang des EU-Rechts keinen Vorbehalt eingelegt hat. Ein zweiter Abschnitt beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob das Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und das Urteil des polnischen Verfassungsgerichts miteinander vergleichbar sind.

Compliance in komplexen Lieferketten
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (5/2021)
Eine singuläre Lösung für mehrstufige Wertschöpfungsketten unter REACH, Turkey-REACH, UK-REACH und Korea-REACH



 Angemeldet bleiben

Passwort vergessen?

Der ASK Wissenspool
Mit Klick auf die jüngste Ausgabe des Content -Partners zeigt sich das gesamte Angebot des Partners

Selbst Partner werden?
Dann interessiert Sie sicher das ASK win - win Prinzip:
ASK stellt kostenlos die Abwicklungs- und Marketingplattform - die Partner stellen den Content.
Umsätze werden im Verhältnis 30 zu 70 (70% für den Content Partner) geteilt.

Neu in ASK? Dann gleich registrieren und Vorteile nutzen...