Regulating New Risks: Emergency Contexts, Institutional Reform and the Difficulties of Europeanisation – Case Studies from Portugal

The regulation of risks created or made more acute by contemporary industrial and technological society (including environmental pollution, food contamination, potential environmental or public health impacts of high-voltage electric grids or of genetically modified agriculture and food) has been the focus of significant attention from the social sciences in recent decades. Analyses of risk regulation have fostered greater interest in studying the regulation of economic and social activities. In a broad sense, regulation means the control of a public agency over the activities that are valued by a community.1 More specifically, regulation can be understood to consist of legislative, administrative or conventional measures through which the state determines, controls or shapes the behaviour of economic or social agents, either directly or through delegation, to prevent the harmful effects of such behaviour on socially respected interests or values, and to guide them into directions which are socially desirable.

The expression “risk regulation” conveys the idea of normalisation of the way in which the State deals with the problems raised by risk, through rules, institutions and procedures set up to either prevent risk or manage it once it materialises. It must be conceded, however, that there is a tension between risk regulation (understood as a means of bringing risk under control) and the fact that the emergence of new risks has persistently caused turmoil. For this reason, risk is proving to be a serious test of the State’s ability to pursue the public interest when dealing with issues which are characteristically complex, both technically and socially. The European Union has responded to the BSE and GMO crises by developing a truly European risk regulation system which has been a major driver of legal and institutional reform. Implementation has been far from homogeneous across the Member States, however, my premise being that the objective of normalisation has met perhaps unexpected obstacles in Southern European countries like Portugal, raising the question of the kind of local conditions which may either favour or hinder Europeanisation processes. This paper discusses the topic based on the analysis of three case studies illustrating the way the Portuguese state has tackled environmental and public health risks, and the impact of EU law and policy on the whole question.



Copyright: © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Quelle: Issue 04/2011 (Dezember 2011)
Seiten: 13
Preis inkl. MwSt.: € 41,65
Autor: Maria Eduarda Gonçalves

Artikel weiterleiten In den Warenkorb legen Artikel kommentieren


Diese Fachartikel könnten Sie auch interessieren:

Muss eine Kommune wirtschaftlich sein?
© ASK-EU (7/2022)
Betrachtung nur bezogen auf die Aufgabenerfüllung bei Abfallwirtschaft, Stadtreinigung und Winterdienst

Growth Potential for Energy-from-Waste Plant Operators in the European Union and Beyond
© TK Verlag - Fachverlag für Kreislaufwirtschaft (9/2016)
Across Europe, there is growing recognition that energy, raw materials, environmental and security policy can all be components of an interdependent policy strategy, and that waste management also plays a role at the intersection of these policies. The European Commission is currently preparing a Communication which will explore the contribution that energy from waste (EfW) can make to the European Energy Union. The Energy Union is designed to reduce the EU’s reliance on energy from Russia, following the dramatic events in Ukraine. The EU’s strategic energy and security goals create an opportunity to implement the longstanding EU waste Management targets, particularly with regard to landfilling.

The Coolsweep Project - establishing common resources across borders within the field of waste-to-energy
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2014)
Waste poses a major problem area as well as a great business potential in countries throughout the globe. Therefore, cross-regional collaboration between leading companies, universities, and public authorities is not only necessary to overcome problems of environmental degradation and pollution; it is also good business for everyone. The Coolsweep project aims to support the development of these cross-regional partnerships by establishing research driven collaboration between leading European stakeholders within waste-to-energy. The project partners include five major European cleantech cluster organisations, two universities and one cluster analysis organisation deriving from Italy, Spain, Denmark, Austria, Norway, and Latvia.

Schutt, Steine, Erden - Die Strategien für die Bewirtschaftung mineralischer Bauabfälle und deren Einsatz als Recycling-Baustoffe müssen optimiert werden
© Rhombos Verlag (8/2014)
Dem achten Monitoringbericht des Kreislaufwirtschaftsträgers Bau zufolge wurden im Jahre 2010 knapp 96 Prozent des Straßenaufbruchs recycelt. Aufgrund der hohen Ölpreise ist der Wiedereinsatz des Altasphalts zur Substitution vor allem von Bitumen gerade in den Heißasphaltmischwerken auch wirtschaftlich attraktiv. Demgegenüber lag für Bauschutt die Recyclingquote bei 78 Prozent. Über zwei Millionen Tonnen wurden über Deponien beseitigt, über neun Millionen Tonnen auf Deponien oder beim Verfüllen verwertet. Diese Form der Verwertung schont keine Ressourcen.

Verantwortung auf dezentraler Ebene
© ia GmbH - Wissensmanagement und Ingenieurleistungen (7/2014)
"Wir werden irgendwann feststellen, dass wir Kohle und Erdöl im Boden belassen müssen." Soll das 2-Grad-Ziel weiter realistisch verfolgt werden, so stehen den fossilen Reserven an Erdöl, Ergas und Kohle von derzeit 800 Gigatonnen sowie weiteren fossilen Ressourcen von etwa 13.000 Gigatonnen lediglich 210 Gigatonnen an Kohlenstoff gegenüber, die von der Atmosphäre aufgenommen werden können.

Name:

Passwort:

 Angemeldet bleiben

Passwort vergessen?

Der ASK Wissenspool
 
Mit Klick auf die jüngste Ausgabe des Content -Partners zeigt sich das gesamte Angebot des Partners
 

Selbst Partner werden?
 
Dann interessiert Sie sicher das ASK win - win Prinzip:
 
ASK stellt kostenlos die Abwicklungs- und Marketingplattform - die Partner stellen den Content.
 
Umsätze werden im Verhältnis 30 zu 70 (70% für den Content Partner) geteilt.
 

Neu in ASK? Dann gleich registrieren und Vorteile nutzen...